LulzSec has taken over The Sun's online site. All hits to the site go directly to LulzSec's Twitter feed. It is, effectively, being held hostage by hackers.
LulzSec is also claiming that they are redirecting all viewers going to Murdoch's News International site, as well.
These hacks are redirects only. By clicking onto these links, it will take you to a Twitter page, which is safe and will not damage your computer. I would be willing to say that LulzSec is planning on releasing a statement via their Twitter feed soon, and is using this to get attention.
It's definitely worth a peek.
Update: Apparently, LulzSec had originally placed a story on The Sun's website claiming that News Corp owner Rupert Murdoch was dead. It was as a result of a suicide from a palladium overdose. When the IT department at The Sun kept removing the story, LulzSec had no other choice but to take the site offline altogether.
Showing posts with label Rupert Murdoch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rupert Murdoch. Show all posts
Monday, July 18, 2011
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Fox News Focuses On Real Victim Of News Corp. Scandal: News Corp.
Unless you've been hiding under a rock with you fingers in your ears, you have heard something in regards to the News of the World phone hacking scandal. That is, unless you've been watching Fox News. Even though the UK tabloid closed it's doors on July 10th, after 168 years in business, Fox didn't air their first story on the scandal until July 13th. The nature of that story, by Gretta Van Susteren, was more along the lines of, "The British government is forcing News Corp to give up on it's purchase of BSkyB." All of the other details regarding the illegal and unethical practices News Corp has been involved in was secondary.
Fast forward to Friday morning, July 15th. Fox and Friends airs a segment with a "PR expert", saying that "the problem isn't with News Corp, but with hacking itself". The story takes a decidedly "stop picking on us" turn when they talk about how this was something that happened "over a decade ago", and that hundreds of people are now unemployed because of the actions of "1% of their workforce". Just watch:
This is not opinion. This is not editorial commentary. This is the blatant, intentional misleading of the American public. I guarantee, GUARANTEE, that if MSNBC were accused of hacking the email and personal phone accounts of 9/11 victims in order to get leads, Fox would have a fucking field day. It would be the only thing they would talk about, 24 hours a day, for weeks on end. They would be calling for the FCC to shut them down and their Democratic supporters in Washington to be arrested on accessory charges.
Oh, speaking of arrests, Rebekah Brooks, one of Rupert Murdoch's top lieutenants at News of the World, was arrested this morning on multiple corruption charges. London's Police Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, resigned this morning in the wake of the growing scandal. But, I guess they're both victims of this whole thing, too.
Unbelievable.
Fast forward to Friday morning, July 15th. Fox and Friends airs a segment with a "PR expert", saying that "the problem isn't with News Corp, but with hacking itself". The story takes a decidedly "stop picking on us" turn when they talk about how this was something that happened "over a decade ago", and that hundreds of people are now unemployed because of the actions of "1% of their workforce". Just watch:
This is not opinion. This is not editorial commentary. This is the blatant, intentional misleading of the American public. I guarantee, GUARANTEE, that if MSNBC were accused of hacking the email and personal phone accounts of 9/11 victims in order to get leads, Fox would have a fucking field day. It would be the only thing they would talk about, 24 hours a day, for weeks on end. They would be calling for the FCC to shut them down and their Democratic supporters in Washington to be arrested on accessory charges.
Oh, speaking of arrests, Rebekah Brooks, one of Rupert Murdoch's top lieutenants at News of the World, was arrested this morning on multiple corruption charges. London's Police Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson, resigned this morning in the wake of the growing scandal. But, I guess they're both victims of this whole thing, too.
Unbelievable.
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Tuesday, July 12, 2011
OK, I'll Go There
Since no one else has.....and you know we're all thinking it.
News of the World printed it's last issue Sunday and closed it's doors after 168 years and 8,674 editions, amid widespread reports of illegal and immoral journalistic practices. Reporters and senior management alike have been implicated in hacking the personal emails and phone lines of celebrities, politicians, and even a missing 13 year old girl, just to get a story.
Rupert Murdoch, the owner of the paper, has kept quiet over the last week, as he is currently in London picking up the pieces of one of his four UK newspapers. With each day that passes, more and more information is coming to light showing just how heinous and morally bankrupt the institution was. People were threatened. Policemen were bribed. Even the Prime Minister's personal information was hacked, simply to get a lead and sell a few extra newspapers.
So, people are wondering: How much did Murdoch know? He hand-picked many of the higher ups that were personally involved in the illegal activity. This has been going on for a decade. He had to know. He HAD to.
What I'm asking is this: Murdoch owned News of the World. He also owns Fox Broadcasting and Fox News. You can't tell me that the UK half of his media empire is corrupt, yet the U.S. half is squeaky clean. If Murdoch was in on it, what's not to say that he had a "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" attitude toward his other outlets.
News of the World went to these horrific extremes to simply sell newspapers. Fox News is the voice of the Republican party in the United States. It's viewers are told what issues are important to them, how to think, and who to vote for. Fox has former White House press secretaries, campaign managers, and party strategists on their payroll. They also have had a half dozen Republican Presidential candidates as commentators.
Wouldn't Rupert Murdoch have more of an interest in changing minds and public policy in the United States than selling tabloids in the UK? He has a $6+ billion personal fortune to protect, after all.
It's common knowledge that Fox News lies to their viewers. It's also common knowledge that their viewers are the least knowledgeable when compared to those of other programs. It's not a coincidence. Many of Fox's drones still believe that Barack Obama is a Muslim or that he wasn't born in the United States. More than 60% don't believe in global warming. What is Fox News up to?
When the payoff becomes the White House, along with the possibility of decades of corporate and personal tax legislation in your favor, wouldn't you want to protect your investment?
News of the World printed it's last issue Sunday and closed it's doors after 168 years and 8,674 editions, amid widespread reports of illegal and immoral journalistic practices. Reporters and senior management alike have been implicated in hacking the personal emails and phone lines of celebrities, politicians, and even a missing 13 year old girl, just to get a story.
Rupert Murdoch, the owner of the paper, has kept quiet over the last week, as he is currently in London picking up the pieces of one of his four UK newspapers. With each day that passes, more and more information is coming to light showing just how heinous and morally bankrupt the institution was. People were threatened. Policemen were bribed. Even the Prime Minister's personal information was hacked, simply to get a lead and sell a few extra newspapers.
So, people are wondering: How much did Murdoch know? He hand-picked many of the higher ups that were personally involved in the illegal activity. This has been going on for a decade. He had to know. He HAD to.
What I'm asking is this: Murdoch owned News of the World. He also owns Fox Broadcasting and Fox News. You can't tell me that the UK half of his media empire is corrupt, yet the U.S. half is squeaky clean. If Murdoch was in on it, what's not to say that he had a "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" attitude toward his other outlets.
News of the World went to these horrific extremes to simply sell newspapers. Fox News is the voice of the Republican party in the United States. It's viewers are told what issues are important to them, how to think, and who to vote for. Fox has former White House press secretaries, campaign managers, and party strategists on their payroll. They also have had a half dozen Republican Presidential candidates as commentators.
Wouldn't Rupert Murdoch have more of an interest in changing minds and public policy in the United States than selling tabloids in the UK? He has a $6+ billion personal fortune to protect, after all.
It's common knowledge that Fox News lies to their viewers. It's also common knowledge that their viewers are the least knowledgeable when compared to those of other programs. It's not a coincidence. Many of Fox's drones still believe that Barack Obama is a Muslim or that he wasn't born in the United States. More than 60% don't believe in global warming. What is Fox News up to?
When the payoff becomes the White House, along with the possibility of decades of corporate and personal tax legislation in your favor, wouldn't you want to protect your investment?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)